You are here > Organizational Structure>

    Did you know? Hundreds of dollars can be saved with "Fax by Automation"                                                                                       Did you know? Outlook Forms can be used to provide a seamless and paperless "Approval Process"
What our clients say?

Company Organizational Structure
 
 
The exceptional services and the quality of deliverables at USAT saved a great deal of cost and efforts in building our software product.
 
CEO, Crane Care Inc. MI
 
Your method of analysis and approaches to problem solving are impressive. We would not be able to develop our customized operations management software without your help. All our employees are very happy with the final outcome. The product we are now using and is saving tremendous amount of  time and cost in running our business. 
 
President
GemStone Real Estate Inc. MI
 
The quality and the stability of the project management system you developed is greatly appreciated by our Project Managers around North America. We recommend USAT to any company without reservation. The continuity of your support is helping our operations. 
 
We want to thank you for your help in entire project life cycle and continued support.
 
Sr. National Ops Manager
Building Technologies division of fortune 500 company.  


Comparison of Organizational Structures.

Organization Structure

Functional

Matrix

Projectized

Project Characteristics

Weak Matrix

Balanced Matrix

Strong Matrix

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project Manager’s Authority

Little or None

Limited

(Coordinator)

Low to Moderate

Moderate to High

High to almost Total

Resource Availability

Little or None

Limited

Low to Moderate

Moderate to High

High to almost Total

Who controls the Project Budget

Functional Manager

Functional Manager

Mixed

Project Manager

Project Manager

Project Manager’s Role

Part-time

Part-time

Full-time

Full-Time

Full-time

Project Management Admin. Staff

Part-time

Part-time

Part-time

Full-time

Full-time

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advantages

Ø  Easier Management of Specialists

Ø  Team members report to only one supervisor

Ø  Similar resources are centralized and company is grouped by specialties

Ø  Clearly defined career paths in the area of work specialization

Ø    Highly visible project objectives

Ø    Improved project manager control over resources

Ø    More support from functional organizations

Ø    Maximum utilization of scarce resource

Ø    Better coordination

Ø    Better horizontal and vertical dissemination of Information than functional.

Ø    Team member maintain a home

Ø    Efficient project organization

Ø    Loyalty to the project

Ø    More effective communication than functional.

Ø    Team members do maintain home while they are on project.

Ø    Most appropriate when the project size is large and technology is new

 

Disadvantages

 

v Team members place more emphasis on their functional specialty to the detriment of the project.

v No career path in project management.

v Project Manager has little of no authority.

 

v   Extra Administration required (Admin Staff required)

v   More than one boss for project team

v   More complex to monitor and control

v   Tougher problems with resource allocation.

v   Need extensive policies and procedures

v   Functional managers have different priorities than project managers

v   More potential to conflict.

 

 

v   No “Home” when project is completed.

v   Lack of professionalism in discipline

v   Duplication of facilities and job functions

v   Less efficient use of resources.